Não é bem assim. O Bundesrat fez uma série de sugestões, não resoluções.
O Bundesrat é algo equivalente à câmara dos lordes inglesa.
O parlamento alemão é o Bundestag.
http://seekingalpha.com/news/3213236-germany-says-nein-internal-combustion-engines:"The actual resolution, it's a bit more complex:
(I'll summarize, since it's in German)
It's a reply to this EU document from the summer, and it basically states the Bundesrat's ideas and suggestions about the subject matter. (EDIT: As nannos points out in a comment further down, this document is merely a letter with suggestions for the EU commission and doesn't ban anything, since that'd be beyond the power of the Bundesrat)
1. Since it's impossible to make industry and agriculture emission-free by 2050, the goal should be to get to zero-emission mobility by 2050, to be achieved in a way that doesn't endanger EU prosperity.
2. EU should be "de-carbonised"(
carbon-neutral, I guess...) by 2050
3. This should be connected to noise-reduction efforts
4. A mix of tax strategies and financial incentives should be used to make all newly registered cars zero-emission by 2030.
5. It's important to look at emissions from railroads and ships,as well.
6. There should be subsidies for public transportation, and car or bike sharing.
The rest is detailed stuff about asking the federal government to influence certain related EU regulations in a way that's most practical for Germany.
TL;DR: They suggest that new cars (it specifically states that it's only about cars, not buses or trucks) shouldn't have ICEs by 2030 and that all road traffic should be zero-emission by 2050."
São ideias muito bonitas e politicamente correctas, mas não vejo qual a solução para a quebra de receita fiscal resultante da venda de combustíveis e veículos novos e como conciliar isso com os benefícios fiscais e subsídios.
Edit: Comentário ao artigo colocado pelo meopeace